May 1st, 2007
March 24th, 2006
|01:37 pm - THE ALL NEW CNN POLL|
Created: Thursday, March 23, 2006, at 17:04:53 EDT
Do you agree with Charlie Sheen that the U.S. government covered up the real events of the 9/11 attacks? (The results as of March 24, 2006, 8:30 am)
Total: 9397 votes
March 23rd, 2006
Note: It's no surprise this article has demonized Charlie Sheen in a worse possible way but at least it grabbed some attention of the mainstream media, especially after four years of silence.
Charlie Sheen doesn’t buy 9/11 spin
By Inside Track
Thursday, March 23, 2006
Charlie Sheen, following in the footsteps of his politically outspoken father, Martin Sheen, has joined the chorus of conspiracy theorists who don’t believe the official version of events surrounding 9/11.
The estranged husband of Denise Richards, who is better known for his affinity for prostitutes and gambling than his Homeland Security credentials, told the GCN Radio Network he doesn’t buy the government’s explanation that “19 amateurs with box cutters (took) over four commercial airliners and (hit) 75 percent of their targets.”
( Read more...Collapse )
|08:08 pm - BROUGHT TO YOU BY CNN|
Charlie Sheen Questions Official 9/11 Explanations
Aired March 22, 2006 - 19:00:00 ET
Full Transcript: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0603/22/sbt.01.html
A.J. HAMMER, CO-HOST: I`m A.J. Hammer in New York City.
BROOKE ANDERSON, CO-HOST: And I`m Brooke Anderson live in Hollywood. TV`s only live entertainment news show starts right now.
A Charlie Sheen shocker. Tonight, the actor`s stunning statements on 9/11. Maybe the airplanes did not take down the Twin Towers. And maybe the government is covering it all up.
CHARLIE SHEEN, ACTOR: Taking ever four commercial airliners and hitting 75 percent of their targets, that feels like a conspiracy theory.
HAMMER: SHOWBIZ TONIGHT investigates the startling allegations.
ANDERSON: Hi there, I`m Brooke Anderson, live in Hollywood
HAMMER: I`m A.J. Hammer, live in New York City.
But Brooke, of course, you remember where you were on September 11.
ANDERSON: Absolutely, A.J. I was at work at CNN in Atlanta, and I remember being in complete and utter shock and dismay.
HAMMER: Yes, I was workings, as well, here in New York City and like most people just thinking this is absolutely unbelievable.
Well, there`s another thing that you may not believe about September 11 and what someone is saying. Charlie Sheen, star of CBS`s successful sitcom, "Two and a Half Men", says point blank, 9/11, the Pentagon, the World Trade Center, this is all a cover up. Is this for real? Well, SHOWBIZ TONIGHT has the tape that has people asking, what`s the truth?
( Read more...Collapse )
March 19th, 2006
March 15th, 2006
|12:41 pm - THE 115 OMMISIONS AND DISTORTIONS IN THE 9/11 COMMISION REPORT|
The 9/11 Commission Report: A 571-Page Lie
by Dr. David Ray Griffin
Sunday, May 22, 2005
In discussing my second 9/11 book, The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions, I have often said, only half in jest, that a better title might have been "a 571-page lie." (Actually, I was saying "a 567-page lie," because I was forgetting to count the four pages of the Preface.) In making this statement, one of my points has been that the entire Report is constructed in support of one big lie: that the official story about 9/11 is true.
Another point, however, is that in the process of telling this overall lie, The 9/11 Commission Report tells many lies about particular issues. This point is implied by my critique's subtitle, "Omissions and Distortions." It might be thought, to be sure, that of the two types of problems signaled by those two terms, only those designated "distortions" can be considered lies.
It is better, however, to understand the two terms as referring to two types of lies: implicit and explicit. We have an explicit lie when the Report claims that the core of each of the Twin Towers consisted of a hollow steel shaft or when it claims that Vice President Cheney did not give the shoot-down order until after 10:10 that morning. But we have an implicit lie when the Commission, in its discussion of the 19 alleged suicide hijackers, omits the fact that at least six of them have credibly been reported to be still alive, or when it fails to mention the fact that Building 7 of the World Trade Center collapsed. Such omissions are implicit lies partly because they show that the Commission did not honor its stated intention "to provide the fullest possible account of the events surrounding 9/11." They are also lies insofar as the Commission could avoid telling an explicit lie about the issue in question only by not mentioning it, which, I believe, was the case in at least most instances.
Given these two types of lies, it might be wondered how many lies are contained in The 9/11 Commission Report. I do not know. But, deciding to see how many lies I had discussed in my book, I found that I had identified over 100 of them. Once I had made the list, it occurred to me that others might find this summary helpful. Hence this article.
One caveat: Although in some of the cases it is obvious that the Commission has lied, in other cases I would say, as I make clear in the book, that it appears that the Commission has lied. However, in the interests of simply giving a brief listing of claims that I consider to be lies, I will ignore this distinction between obvious and probable lies, leaving it to readers, if they wish, to look up the discussion in The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions. For ease in doing this, I have parenthetically indicated the pages of the book on which the various issues are discussed.
Given this clarification, I now list the omissions and claims of The 9/11 Commission Report that I, in my critique of that report, portrayed as lies:
( Read more...Collapse )
|12:33 pm - THE SEPTEMBER 11TH PETITION|
4,700 signatures and counting...
Scholars Call for Release of 9/11 Information
TO THE MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND
OF THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:*
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT,
On Behalf of the People of the United States of America, the Undersigned Scholars for 9/11 Truth Hereby Petitions for, and hereby demands, Release of the Following kinds of documents, video and films, and physical evidence to the public for study by experts and scholars investigating the events of 9/11:
( Read more...Collapse )
|10:25 am - INDUSTRIAL BAND, MINISTRY, EXPOSES 9/11 TRUTH MOVEMENT|
Do you ever have one of those albums that you just love/hate because you can't stop listening to it?
Well, Ministry's live album, "In Case You Didn't Feel Like Showing Up" was one of the albums I just love/hate because I couldn't stop listening to it. And their new album, "Rio Grande Blood" is slated to be release on May 2nd. One of the titled songs in the album, "LIES LIES LIES", includes an audio sample from the 9/11 documentry, Loose Change, 2nd Edition...
"Gentlemen, we have called you together to inform you that we are going to overthrow the United States Government.
Do you still think that jet fuel brought down the World Trade Center?
Does anybody else see a problem here?
If the government has nothing to hide, why are they so afraid to answer a few questions?
This story does NOT add up!"
Again, big up to 911blogger.com
|10:08 am - DEMOCRAT WESLEY CLARK: WE NEED TO INVESTIGATE 9/11|
..."we've never finished the investigation of 9/11 and whether the administration actually misused the intelligence information at hand, the evidence seems pretty clear to me..." -Wesley Clark
This is HUGE...
I want to point out few things...
The FBI was forced by the US governement to discontinue the investigation on October 10, 2001, meaning they were given only a month to gather information that could help lead them to the culprits.
It's IMPOSSIBLE for the Bush administration to name Osama bin Laden as the suspect within seven hours of the attacks when they've claimed they had no prior knowledge of the operation being planned.
Also, it's IMPOSSIBLE for the FBI to name the 19 hijackers in just three to four days after the attacks took place...especially after the fact the hijackers' names were not on the passengers list AND several of the hijacker suspects came up alive and well.
You saw it. You were there. Think about it...
Big up to 911blogger.com and Crooksandliars.com...
March 6th, 2006
|03:13 pm - 90 PERCENT OF U.S. SOLDIERS BELIEVES SADDAM PLAYED A ROLE IN 9/11|
US censors websites
If you are not for us you are against us
By Nick Farrell: Thursday 02 March 2006, 15:46
US MARINES stationed in Iraq are complaining that the US government is restricting access their access to websites too much.
Along with porn sites, on the Army’s list of banned sites include mail sites such as Yahoo, AT&T, Hotmail. The censors are also blocking blogs and sites that do not agree with the current administration.
One marine wrote to a site called Wonkette to tell them that it was on the banned list. He said he didn’t mind The Army blocking access to porn sites, because it was a government network but he and the troops were getting miffed that access to email and possibly-not-toeing-the-government-line websites was a bit much.
Apparently the censorship is being done by the USMC Network Operations Center in Quantico, VA.
They don’t like it when troops want read minute-by-minute updates of Anna Nicole Smith's appearance before the Supreme Court or read birthday cards to disgraced lobbyists.
Almost 90% think war is retaliation for Saddam’s role in 9/11, most don’t blame Iraqi public for insurgent attacks
US President George Bush has said there is no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved in the 11 September attacks (September 2003).
An overwhelming majority of 72% of American troops serving in Iraq think the U.S. should exit the country within the next year, and more than one in four say the troops should leave immediately, a new Le Moyne College/Zogby International survey shows.